Can someone edit my answer?
Posted in enart.xn--gmq282eogn.com on the March 11, 2010
Answer:
We did not change a lot to try to improve the plane; however we combined some ideas of other planes in order to make a big improvement. First of all, we changed the tip of the plane. It was used to be flat, but we modified it to a sharp point. We predicted that it will perk up but when we tested the result was not we were looking for. Then, we thought of modifying it again so then we thought of making the triangle smaller when folding up over the two flaps. Eventually, when we tested it again, it flew astonishingly.
In attempt to improve the plane, we did not make many changes. We combined other some ideas from other planes. That was our improvement.
We changed the tip of the plane. Intially, the tip of the plane was flat, but we modified it to be sharp. We made a hypothesis that it will perk up. However, when we tested it out, the result was not what we predicted it to be.
After that, we modified it again. We made the triangle smaller when folding up over the two flaps.
Finally, we tested it again. It flew astonishing. My 2nd hypothesis was correct.
According to our hypothesis, a more compact tip would improve the plane's flight pattern.
Eventually, when we tested it again, it flew astonishingly well.
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |